There has been much written in the last several months ideologically about the Tea Party movement, although Karl Rove has performed modestly as a columnist for the Wall St. Journal, but most criticism it is not informed enough to permit any rigor to its principals, however, with recent criticism comes a renewed effort of those committed to this movement to publicly announce and affirm its core principals. I must warn both politicians and institutionalized people in any discipline to be wary for the tidal wave of change coming from the titanic Keynesian failed stimulus and the new decentralized media that is today’s informed consumer. Watch for the destruction of anything that is intractable, for it will not be able to withstand the tidal wave of ideological strength that is the Tea Party Movement.
Most join out of anger concerning that the nations fiscal path is not sustainable. Even the Federal Reserve is getting nervous about inflation, and the recent news reports of States and Unions needing bailout will only solidify the membership and resolve of Tea Party people.
Unless we forget, America was founded on a revolutionary principal grounded in natural law, yet discovered by reason that all men are created equal. The inalienable rights doctrine of John Locke is still reverberating today, just witness the kind of citizen participation the Tea Party is evoking.
Let’s face it, this is a social phenomena with huge political consequences philosophically for the status of political craft inside Washington. Tea Party people will hue to politically tried and conservatively sound ideological principals even if they are inconvenient. The secret is found in their ability to associate by mutual consent. Even the late great Nobel Economist Fredrick Hayek spoke of ‘spontaneous order’ in regard to his dislike of any rigid idealism either political or economic. The spontaneous life of the Tea Party order makes it unstoppable.
One of Hayek’s contemporaries was Dr. Peter Drucker, who has written extensively on leadership and its structure in corporate governance. For Drucker, high amounts of decentralization permits spheres of autonomy to gain traction and succeed in any endeavor, for it allows individual initiative to thrive.
Why are they hated? It’s really quite simple. The answer is found philosophically.
Big government ideological left is drawn to the COMPULSORY NATURE OF CENTRALIZATION! THESE KIND OF IDEOLOGUES SIMPLY CANNOT IMAGINE AN UNDIRECTED SOCIAL ORDER!! Many authors have already discovered the fascist impulse grounding the contemporary liberal order. We are witnessing it today in acknowledging resistance to any imposed social order.
So, just what are the principals of the Tea Party Movement? They are as follows:
1. Limited government (a return to the enumerated, separated powers.)
2. Market reforms (this permits decentralization to flourish by allowing individual initiative regarding social security, taxation, health care etc. . . )
3. Opposition to Obamacare.
4. Opposition to cap-and-trade restrictions that will most surely kill job creation and economic growth, while permitting status quo ‘to-big-to-fail’ Wall St. firms to flourish as mediators between citizens and governance.
In a sentence, the Tea Party people are bringing more serious, more adult political commitment to restrained government.
November’s coming!
That was a great read. Thank you !!
The content on this article is really 1 of the most effective material that I’ve ever appear across. I love your submit, I’ll appear back to verify for new posts.