When investigators are up against a wall, when all leads fail to show causation, then they begin to ask direct forensic questions in an attempt to square a circle. That square has now come full circle. There is only one way to answer a direct question regarding the death of Alberto Nisman. Who would benefit from his murder? Answer: the Iranians.
As a prosecutor, Alberto Nisman has years of recorded wiretaps demonstrating criminal collusion between Iranian agents (Hezbollah) and the Kirchner government. The Argentinian government wanted cheap oil, gas from Iran; the Iranians want a meddling prosecutor dead!
This entire case began in 1994 when Iranian agents abroad bombed Buenos Aries Jewish Community killing scores of Jews. Nisman’s objective was never to bring down the President of Argentina, it was to extradite Iranian agents to face trial.
The Iranians are winning throughout the west. Who will stop the satanic mullah’s?
As time goes by, Dr. Allan Meltzer will be vindicated in his analysis of the great moral failure of the entire American political class’ handling of the ‘Great Recession’. Dr. Meltzer had numerated his thought in several journals and lectures that I will briefly detail here at a later date. Nevertheless, I found a comment by Ludgwig von Mises that is very relevant to Meltzer’s analysis.
“The elitist political class buries its true agenda in completx economic models and tells its citizens that they are just too unsophisticated to understand. Ultimately though, the political class knows what must be done, but they don’t know how to get re-elected once they’ve done it.”
“There are in the field of economics, no constant relations.”
“All econometric models are useless because they fail to account for the coercive and distorting effects of government interventions. The Federal Reserve, Fannie Mae, Freddie Max, the tax code and all the federal bureaucracies combined en masse are exogenous factors weighing on an economy that is taxed, regulated and coerced almost to death.”
Let’s get power relations straight. The Federal Reserve is a powerful, even a transnational power. It is arguably the single most powerful institution on the planet. It TOO can be defeated, weakened, and brought down. The impact of weak purchasing power is well known, remember Weimar, Japan, Russia, Germany, Mexico, the list is nearly endless. Every great political power that ever existed has had to deal with potentially life-threatening policy adjustments to keep parity.
But let’s remember that realpolitik is synonymous with relativism, and those at the helm of the Federal Reserve quietly know that they’re a creature of Congress! They either play along or get played. You’re either at the table, or your ON the table. The Fed knows this and has historically dealt well with this arrangement. I cannot say the same for the last ten years. The hit job(s) that are lining up to size-up the Fed will shake D.C. I have no other way to say it but bluntly.
F.R.A.T. = Federal Reserve Accountability & Transparency Act has threatened to hamstring the hyper-expansionary, accommodative policies that characterizes EVERY failed Federal Reserve Chairman EVER!! The adoption of the Taylor rule is simple: it means that any expansionary policy to accommodate demand must watch two independent variables simultaneously, namely the output gap & inflation. This is hardly a threat to balkanize the Fed.
AUDIT the FED is the second threat. It has nearly nothing to do with accounting but instead asks that Fed managers expose their political philosophy in their attempt to accommodate excessive demand. This would be done via the Government Accountability Office (GAO). What Congress asks is that the voting members of the Federal Reserve provide transparency regarding monetary policy decisions.
How else to say it: a truly independent Fed would welcome any policy attempt to strengthen its credibility.
Anyone over the age of 45 remembers a predominant cash economy. You mortgaged a home only, everything else was cash, including tuition. How things have changed! What has not changed are the dominant social achievements & institutions that underwrite upper-middle class lifestyles, these include capital formation, health insurance, post-graduate credentials and vacations. All of these are unwritten by full time employment.
So is marriage!
But I’ll get to that one another time. Its a related topic if only because so many young people today make the presumption that if you’re married you’ve got your life together. Interesting correlation.
The Federal Reserve’s own studies correlating numerous social, demographic currents embodying social mobility are rarely if ever mentioned in the public; why reveal miserable output when our public institutions do such a fine job of pronouncing intentions! The truth is a very ugly reality when it comes to education, debt and social mobility. According to the Federal Reserve’s own studies, the cost of college tuition has outgrown costs in health care, credit cards, auto loans and refinancings. The annual debt burden for tuition is $1.3 trillion dollars and rising.
The damaging results are ubiquitous.
Graduating students delay marriage. They delay children. Both trends reveal a startling economic and social arrangement for aspirations. This social group postpones mortgages, cars and numerous other capital intensive purchases that secure one’s social standing when paid in full. Nearly 45% of all college graduates return home after school.
Just ask your neighbor.
These self imposed challenges remain because mandatory fiscal spending is politically enshrined and untouchable.
These realties only match the pathetically weak recovery that began in June 2009. Past generations implicitly knew that standards of living rose. We have saddled ourselves to honor the social, political achievements unfit to navigate our immediate future. Are we up for the challenge? The conservative wing of the G.O.P. is ready, anyone else?
The cacophony of half truths never relent, this is especially true for the discipline of economics. The adults that make up the White House Press Corps., journalism and hosts of other digital media never seem to get around to acknowledging intrinsic sequencing for economic growth. Instead we get reams of semi-informed voices ranting about secular stagnation, sticky wages etc. . while never really addressing the sources of wealth creation.
Let’s set the record straight: real economic growth comes first, then wages. This sequencing is chiefly derived from productivity gains; both have their source in sound monetary, fiscal policy. Whatever increases productivity, adds to economic growth, these include: additions to capital stock, education/skills, applied technology and finally institutional changes that procure and solidify policy incentives. In a sentence, anything that creates economic freedom.
We haven’t had this policy driven cycle since Reagan. The Federal Reserves ZIRP has deprived interest bearing income to millions of American’s, consequently discouraging both investment, savings and growth. Instead, we’ve seen govmint policy aiming to encourage taxpayer provided benefits that discourage growth.
Let’s remember the whole virtuous cycle begins with getting, implementing the right policy ideas, the right sequencing of fiscal, monetary policy coordination.
If the French ever get serious about counterterrorism they should seek to capture or kill the Islamic leadership ravaging throughout French Africa. Indigenous French resources aren’t readily at hand, however, the reach of Paris by proxy is advantageous.
Chad began deploying troops last Friday night in Cameroon, AFRICOM in Stuttgart, Germany can help given its longstanding presence throughout the region. Nevertheless, the French can use African resources to quell the spell of militant Islam in Africa.
Cameroon’s President Paul Biya has welcomed Chadian troop movements throughout its nation, this doubles the Nigerian effort launched by President Goodluck Jonathan. These tactical efforts must be complimented by governance issues if indigenous counterterror measures are to gain traction. Niger, Chad and Cameroon all share a border with Nigeria. Boko Haram’s reach is moving westward toward the Atlantic, threatening Nigeria from within. Its stronghold is only garnished with weak national governance coupled to fragmented ethnic, religious separatism throughout Nigeria. The vast majority of Boko Haram’s ethnicity are the Kanuri people who are indigenous to Nigeria. It’s founder is a Cameroonian Muslim preacher who moved to Nigeria in the 1940’s, this coupled with the death of Gaddafi opened up the scope for cash rich Riyadh to import radicals.
Chad still holds the regions most experienced fighters. A deeply poor nation of 13 million, spread across an expanse of desert larger than Texas and California combined. Charles de Gaulle built a military base in Chad that the French are welcomed to use in its regional offensive. The key here is sound intelligence and drones. Chad was instrumental in battling Islamic militants who captured Mali in 2013, they were routed by Chadian troops stationed, garrisoned by French sources.
If the French turn their counterterror mission over to their bureaucracies, it will vanish. Bureau is a French word for ‘desk’. Bureaucracies don’t function with any resolve or efficiency, especially those in Europe. Security bureaucracies fail when they are confused about their mission or lack of confidence in the support of their political leadership. The fault lines for mission creep toward no-man’s-land is vast.
Let’s hope the French get, and keep up to speed.
The emergence of Yemen as a failed state is real. The U.S. closed its embassy yesterday while ethnic, ideological strife has engulfed the Arabian southern tier. This comes on the heels of the death of the Saudi monarch several days ago.
Whose to blame? Let’s start with Iran.
Iranian strategy is to support the embattled Shia throughout the lands of Arabia and beyond, even to the point of failure. The Yemeni Shia are known as the Zaidi & Houthis, living mostly in the regions northern Arabian tier, they are embittered enemies of al Qaeda and have been fervently supported by Iran. Yemenite Shia have sought continued political independence and sovereignty for decades. The Iranians now have a militant proxy on the Arabian mainland and seek to threaten the House of Saud.
As of this writing, Iran is winning.
We should note that January 25th marks the fourth anniversary of the Arab Spring in Egypt.
It isn’t difficult to explain the origin of France’s recent terrorist incident, the slaughter of innocent civilians at a paper devoted to satire. What is new, is the emergence of native jihadi cells acting independently of foreign organizations. This new threat is part of Iran’s policy to encircle the west from within, any brief look at European demography shows why the French should worry.
Former C.I.A. officials throughout the west have pointed that the French counter-terror division remains the finest in Europe. Jean-Louis Bruguiere (head of France’s Internal Security) remained cautiously pessimistic about autonomous or indigenous French Jihadi’s acting independently of foreign governments or organizations. That world view may have ended with our most recent threat signaling that French authorities are intent on setting a example of deterrence. My view is more circumspect: if the French authorities ignore the political motivation animating the convictions of this new charismatic Jihad, they will be setting themselves up for slaughter again!! Let’s explain.
If the French cannot or will not show immediate deterrent force, other nation states throughout the west, dependent on French intelligence will fold. Period. Islamic radicals throughout western Europe monitor the pace of Paris’ counter-terror division (DCRI), if Paris doesn’t check the advance of Islamic extremism, IT will explode across western Europe quickly. Ditto for the U.S. which is dependent on monitoring communication signals between various European capitals.
The American Retreat Agenda throughout the Near East has solicited enormous charisma into Jihadi fundamentalism. But it can only be seen/felt in western cities where such political, social freedom is taken for granted. As Fouad Ajami wrote, the nourishment of grievance is a staple product enamoring a new radical vision of Jihadi fundamentalism, it flourishes in political economies that sustain massive welfare states.
What can we take away from this engagement? Its really quite simple: European radicalized Muslims feel encouraged to dictate the terms of European expression of Islam.
AFRICOM is Stuttgart Germany has its hands full given the challenge of managing Boko Haram with insufficient political stability throughout Nigeria, not to mention falling oil prices threatening the entire Nigerian political class. Entire nation states, especially those with un-diversified economies are finding themselves in positions of extraordinary weakness. Boko Haram’s success in tackling Baga in northeastern Nigeria spells disaster, for it was a town under federal government control. Baga hosted the Multi-National Joint Task Force composed of troops from Chad, Niger, Nigeria tasked to control advancing Islamic militias throughout the lake Chad region. This success speaks to the psychological strength Haram exhibits in that it felt confident to confront, engage an organized state sanctioned force. Hundreds of young girls continue to be kidnapped and sold off to slavery, namely fellow jihadi’s who seek to show social prestige in tribal regions. Given the weakness of the Nigerian state, intelligence will be difficult to develop, AFRICOM’s capacity to build C.O.I.N. will take months to field. This is a challenge for our finest soldiers, let’s hope Washington’s political class is up to the fight.
Deep in the annals of Solzhenitsyn’s writings was the abiding conviction that the Russian Orthodox Church was responsible for the success of Soviet Marxism. Its unhistorical liturgies, lovely as they are, imported no historical analogues from which to convey moral norms to fortify a Christian culture as a bulwark against militant atheism. The institutionalized Church sought the defense of the State throughout its heritage. Not with Father Gleb Yakunin who died at the age of 80 on Tuesday after Christmas.
Very few dissidents took the Soviet Union directly on. As with Solzhenitsyn, Father would be converted from Marxism while attending College, ordained during Khruschev’s ‘thaw’ he sought neither refuge nor admonishment in his struggle with the ‘great Satan’. Convicted and sent to internal exile in 1980 he said “I rejoyce that the Lord has sent me this test, as a Christian, I accept it gladly.” His time spent througout the G.U.L.A.G. was noted for his humility and charm.
In 1987 he returned to Moscow and elected to high office. He was officially defrocked as a priest for serving his term in elected office. In 1993 he was offically excommunicated from the Russian Orthodox Church.
He would never give up fighting the Mafia State that took over from Stalin during Putin’s reign.
May God finally Grant Him PEACE. AMEN BROTHER!